![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Every time I run something
OK, except it turns out I can't tell blue from green under the ceiling light in the room where I DM and the names on the labels need to be bigger.
by Victoria Strauss of WRITER BEWARE®
In addition to various economic rights, such as the ability to license and profit from the use of their original work, the Berne Convention (the international source for copyright law) affirms creators’ moral rights.
Moral rights are intended to protect authorship, primarily by ensuring that a creator’s work is published or disseminated with their name—the right of attribution—and that the work can’t be altered or modified in ways that would be deleterious or prejudicial to the author or to the work itself—the right of integrity.
Here’s the relevant language, from Article 6 of Berne:
Independently of the author’s economic rights, and even after the transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work, which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation.
Though there are variations from country to country, in most of the 181 nations that are signatory to Berne, moral rights are recognized to apply to all copyright-protected works.
In the USA, however, there’s no general moral rights provision in copyright law. When the US became a Berne signatory in 1988, Congress decided that existing federal and state laws (such as creators’ right under copyright law to control derivative works, and the Lanham Act, which prevents false attribution) provided equivalent protection to Article 6. Later, the Copyright Act was amended to recognize moral rights only for works of visual art. For other copyright-protected works, the moral rights landscape in the USA is a “patchwork of protections”, to quote the Copyright Office’s 2019 report on moral rights, that is “generally working well and should not be changed.”
If you’re a US writer, does that mean you don’t need to be concerned about moral rights? Not exactly—because you may encounter circumstances where you’re required to give them up.
Moral rights waivers occur almost anywhere. I’ve seen them in book contracts, short fiction and anthology contracts, audiobook contracts, contest guidelines, serialized fiction app contracts, and more. (They are also common in the Terms of Service of apps and platforms that host user comments and other contributions, such as user profiles: you may be shocked at how big this list is.)
Some examples. This one’s from a book contract:
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, Author hereby expressly waives in favor of Publisher, its licensees, assigns or successors in title, as the case may be, all present and future moral rights in the Work accruing to Author, by virtue of statute or otherwise throughout the world for the entire term Publisher retains copyright rights to the Work. Publisher will use commercially reasonable efforts to have the name/pseudonym of Author appear on the jacket (if any), cover and/or title page of every copy of the Work.
Note how, having required the author to waive their right of attribution, the publisher promises to include their name on their work anyway—but only if it’s “commercially reasonable” to do so.
From the contract of a serialized fiction app:
Party B [the author] hereby irrevocably grants his/her moral rights of Work (including rights to object to derogatory treatment) to Party A [the app] and its Affiliates that are necessary and indispensable for exercising all the rights granted to them in this Agreement under the applicable laws.
“Derogatory” in this context doesn’t mean insults or nasty remarks, but rather what Berne defines as “distortion, mutilation or other modification” of the work that might be prejudicial to the author’ reputation. In other words, the app is emphasizing its prerogative under the waiver to change or adapt the work, including in ways the author might find objectionable or hateful.
From a magazine contract (where it’s very unusual to find a moral rights waiver):
You agree that the publisher may publish the work in the style and format of its choosing, including next to advertising Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this document, you expressly waive all moral rights in favor of, and covenants to, Publisher, its Related Licensees and Unrelated Licensees, assigns or successors in title, as the case may be, to refrain from asserting any and all moral rights in the Work or any updates or revisions to the Work, accruing to you now and in the future, by virtue of statute or otherwise, howsoever arising throughout the world. However, Publisher undertakes to make its commercial best efforts to ensure that Author’s Pseudonym or Name, will appear with the story of every copy of the Work published by Publisher, its Related Licensees and Unrelated Licensees.
Moral rights waivers don’t always appear as distinct clauses: they may be just a sentence buried in a general paragraph addressing rights (and thus easily glossed over or overlooked). This is from the rules of a writing contest (see the last sentence):
Upon submission of a story to the email address set out at rule 2, an entrant grants to [Company] a perpetual non-exclusive, worldwide licence to publish the story in any of its magazines or any licensed editions thereof, or in any other format or via any other medium. All intellectual property rights in the story shall remain with the entrant save as set out in these terms and conditions. All entrants shall waive their moral rights in their story in respect of any use of the story by [Company] or any of [Company’s] licensees in accordance with the licence granted herein.
In many European countries, moral rights are inalienable: they cannot be waived (which poses interesting legal questions for European authors who encounter a waiver in a contract or agreement from another country). Elsewhere, including the UK, Canada, and the USA, creators can renounce their moral rights if they choose to do so—although in the UK and Canada, unlike the USA where moral rights aren’t enshrined in law, they can enforce those rights in court if they retain them (here’s one famous example).
Generally speaking, there are two main reasons why publishers and others might want to demand a waiver: they may wish to ensure that they and their affiliates and licensees don’t have to identify the author every time the work is reprinted or adapted (especially where the contract grants multiple subsidiary rights); and they may want the ability to make changes or adaptations without having to seek permission or deal with the possibility that the author might object.
When you sign a moral rights waiver, you give whoever is demanding the waiver the right to do any and all of those things. How likely is it that they will? Maybe not very. But I don’t think you can ever safely assume that the literal language of a contract or other rights-granting vehicle won’t apply to you at some point. In that context, the fact that moral rights aren’t really meaningful for US writers (a “don’t worry about it” response that the publisher or other group may haul out if you object to the waiver) looks a little different. After all, why would any entity include a waiver if they weren’t at least contemplating acting on it–perhaps in countries where moral rights are recognized and the “patchwork of protections” that substitute for them in the US don’t apply? (And if they aren’t contemplating acting on it, why include a waiver at all?)
To agree that something can happen is to acknowledge that it very well might happen. As distant as the possibility may be, if you sign a contract that requires you to give up your moral rights you need to consider how you feel about surrendering control of those important aspects of authorship.
Deciding whether to sign a moral rights waiver or walk away from a contract or agreement that includes one is difficult, complicated, and, ultimately, personal.
Where possible, you can choose to try and negotiate—to strike the waiver entirely, if you can, or modify it–for example, adding language retaining your right to be credited as the author, or ensuring that any reprints or translations include the entire work without making substantial changes or misrepresenting its ideas and themes.
Where negotiation isn’t feasible—contest guidelines, for example–some writers may choose to stand on principle and reject the waiver as unnecessary overreach. Others may decide to risk the potential harm for the sake of the potential benefit, especially where the entity requiring the waiver is notable, or offers clear advantage to a writing career.
The one thing you shouldn’t do is to gloss over a moral rights waiver because you’re not sure what it means, or dismiss it because you believe it’s unlikely to happen, or assume that because you’re a US-based writer it can’t affect you (and don’t let the publisher or other entity gaslight you on these points). Whatever you decide, it should be a careful and considered choice, not a hasty or careless one.
This article is for informational purposes only, and is not intended as legal commentary or advice.
The post Moral Rights: What Writers Need to Know appeared first on SFWA.
by Roxana Arama, Lead Editor
For nearly 30 years, The SFWA Blog has been an essential resource for speculative fiction creators. Our editorial team is excited to begin a new chapter on July 1, 2025, reintroducing our publication with a new name that better reflects who we are and where we’re headed.
The first post on what is now called The SFWA Blog was published in January 1996. It took a few years for The Blog to find its stride and consistently deliver the content our readers have come to expect, but by the mid-2000s, SFF writers were using this space to provide up-to-date insight into their craft and the publishing industry at large.
While the word blog brings to mind the beginnings of our online magazine as a forward-looking platform embracing the new technologies of its day, it now sounds a bit dated. The blog format implies a more casual tone compared to the well-researched and polished articles we publish. The word magazine better describes our content and also honors the dedicated authors who contribute to our publication.
Over the years, our magazine has featured thousands of articles, covering everything from worldbuilding best practices and industry news to emerging trends and craft discussions. Experienced authors generously provided guidance and perspective to aspiring writers through our pages. Many new voices who rose through The SFWA Blog went on to become household names in the literary world. Under its new name, our magazine will empower writers to connect with the larger creative community—just as it always has—by sharing diverse knowledge, exchanging ideas, and encouraging collaboration.
According to the Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction, the word planetside entered the English lexicon in the 1950s through the works of Andre Norton and Damon Knight, two speculative fiction authors who hold a special place in the SFWA community for their lasting influence. We even have two Nebula awards named in their honor: the Andre Norton Nebula Award for Middle Grade and Young Adult Fiction, and the Damon Knight Memorial Grand Master Award. Their legacy is one reason why planetside resonates deeply with us, because it reflects both our roots and our ongoing mission to elevate speculative storytelling.
Though planetside might initially sound like a science fiction term, we invite you to see it as an anchor we provide to our community of creators. While you venture out there, into your worlds of fantasy, game writing, horror, YA, romantasy, poetry, sci-fi, comics, middle-grade, and other genre-bending story forms, we’ll be down here, writing our planetside dispatches that provide you with everything you need to make your adventure as amazing as possible. Think of us as your Planetside Crew (more on that below), which equips you with the essential information and insight you need while you’re exploring the boundless worlds of your creation.
We’d also like to better communicate the sense of wonder and discovery we encounter every time we bring a new article to our readership. As such, with its new logo, Planetside: The Online Magazine of SFWA strives to represent SFWA’s mission to inform, inspire, support, and advocate for creators of speculative fiction worldwide.
Planetside is part of SFWA Publications, which offers a number of publishing services. These include the New Release Newsletter, which helps SFWA members promote their upcoming titles; Singularity, which offers monthly industry news to members; and the NetGalley Partnership Program, which helps authors connect with reviewers and offers priority placement for members. (And we have more to be announced soon!)
But Planetside is special among the SFWA Publications projects because the magazine is for everyone working in SFF: SFWA members or otherwise, professional and professionalizing writers alike. We’re here for the full journey of industry creators. We also strive to bring a wide range of voices, opinions, and perspectives from across the planet to our readers. And that commitment carries through our editorial approach.
The Planetside Crew is the volunteer team that reviews pitches and then edits the submissions for our online magazine. I joined this wonderful group of editors three years ago and have since had the privilege of collaborating with many talented authors on their articles. I’ve also become familiar with the toolkit SFWA Publications uses to maintain its ever-growing platform. As Lead Editor of Planetside, I now manage the magazine’s publishing pipeline and our monthly editorial meetings.
We work as a team on submissions, which expands our ability to reflect the full spectrum of industry know-how. Once a month, we carefully review pitches, evaluating their strengths and considering their role within the broader scope of SFWA Publications. We also follow a set of internal standards that guide us in selecting ideas that are particularly valuable to our readers. We then partner with each author over a few editorial rounds to elevate their article’s argument and focus on clarity, always keeping our audience in mind.
In that spirit, we encourage you to explore SFWA’s many volunteer opportunities—including the Planetside Crew—and consider lending your talents to support our writing and creative community. You can also learn more about writing for our magazine from “What Should I Pitch to Planetside?” and our Submissions Guidelines, complete with open calls to get you started. And if you enjoy our articles, please help us spread the word to your community or on your social media.
As the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association celebrates 60 years of championing speculative fiction and its creators, we at SFWA Publications are thinking about what another 60 years might depend on. We hope that the new name of our online magazine will inspire you to be part of this next chapter, as we continue to provide industry perspectives to SFF writers at every stage of their careers.
I’d like to close with a heartfelt thank you to everyone who has helped us get this far. To every writer who trusted us, every reader who joined us on this journey, our generous volunteers, and all those who contributed to shaping what we’ve become: thank you. Your support, creativity, and dedication have carried us forward, and we couldn’t have done it without you.
The post Introducing Planetside: The Online Magazine of SFWA appeared first on SFWA.
I’m sure this will go well…
Please note: These are work-in-progress colors. Vero should get me the final colors soon.
You can talk about this page at The Young Protectors Community here.
(Disqus comments are still at the bottom of this web page!)
Link to preview page (page 18) for $5+ Patrons:
https://youngprotectors.com/typ4/fallen-ch2-page-18/
Your continued support has always been the reason I’ve been able to continue making this comic. And I am especially grateful to our readers who continue to support this comic month-after-month during this time. Thank you for letting me continue to create these pages. Thank you for being the real superheroes of this comic.
And so, I hope everyone will please join me in wishing a very special Woolfpack anniversary “thank you!” to those Patrons who have been supporting our work for a year or more!
A heroic thank you to Woolfpack members who have been supporting our work for 36 months as of this week (June 29-July 5):
Barry F. and Maxxie L.
(Three years of support! Thank you so much, Barry and Maxxie!)
I’m sending a huge thank you to a Woolfpack member who has been supporting our work for 60 months as of this week (June 29-July 5):
Jeff H.
(Five years of support! Thank you Jeff!)
I’d like to send a big thank you to a Woolfpack member who has been supporting our work for 72 months as of this week (June 29-July 5):
Tom
(Six years of support! Thank you Tom!)
I’d like to give a massive thank you to a member of the Woolfpack who has been supporting our work for 96 months as of this week (June 29-July 5):
Matthew B.
(Eight years of support! Thank you so much, Matthew!)
And let me also send out my biggest howl to members of the Woolfpack who have been supporting this comic and our work from the very beginning!
Here are the awesome readers who have been supporting me and this comic for 120 months (10 years!) as of this week (June 29-July 5):
Sajora, QArt, Adam I. and Curtiss S.
Thank you so much, Sajora, QArt, Adam and Curtiss! Y’all are so awesome!
Thank you all so much for your amazing, ongoing support! It’s the consistent support that is what really allows me to continue making this comic. You all truly are superheroes!
(Would you like to make sure this comic continues? Ready to dive even deeper into The Young Protectors world? Learn more about all the benefits of joining me and your fellow readers as part of The Young Protectors tribe on Patreon and then join the fun!)
So! Cory is within whispering distance of the Baby Kokomogo! But he doesn’t exactly seem to be getting a warm welcome.
Will these two learn to set aside their differences and get along? Or will it all end in tears? (And, perhaps, a last meal.)
Tune in next Wednesday to find out! Hope to see you there!
CSFFA (The Canadian Science Fiction and Fantasy Association) is proud to announce the 2025 CSFFA Hall of Fame inductees.
Clint Budd, fan, convention organizer, modernized CSFFA and created the CSFFA Hall of Fame
Charles R. Saunders, author, journalist, and founder of the “sword and soul” literary genre
Diane L. Walton, editor, mentor, and a founding member of On Spec: The Canadian Magazine of the Fantastic
More information here.
by Brian U. Garrison
A poem doesn’t need an award to have impact. But the process of celebrating builds community, excitement, and audience. With the Hugo and Nebula Awards preparing space in their victory gardens for poetry, new gateways are opening for poems to be declared “The Best.”
Not that there’s one ideal path in poems or awards. Without diversity, every poet would just keep writing the same line. Readers, like the eagle stuck eating Prometheus’s liver again and again, would receive no variety. In the words of Science Fiction & Fantasy Poetry Association (SFPA) Grand Master David C. Kopaska-Merkel, “Vive la diversité.” In poems. In readers. In awards. Let there be multitudes.
Find art that is filling.
The beautiful.
The meaningful.
The impactful.
Poetry fills the world fuller every day. Let’s celebrate!
Momentum has been building for short writing: flash, drabbles, poetry, and more. Awards provide gravity, and like spacecraft slingshotting Jupiter, gravity provides acceleration. I feel the excitement orbiting speculative poetry as I talk to poets and see poetry-curious writers sharpen their quills. The poetry world is spinning faster than Rumpelstiltskin turns straw to gold. May it be unstoppable. More excitement means more poems! More readers!
Each poem written is a skein of yarn. Each reader is woven into the universe’s deep magic. Interconnection among writers, readers, or any group of people builds cohesion. We won’t agree. And yes, declaring one “best” poem is inherently exclusive. But if we enter the journey accepting fuzzy boundaries, picking a winner is one way to see the fabric that binds us.
Watching threads become networks—watching poetry spread—readers are reminded that some poets are even alive. Poems have been written this decade. This year. Today! Annual awards are a reminder that your syllabus, to-be-read pile, and conversations can include more than just a bunch of dead white guys.
F. J. Bergmann, SFPA’s newest Grand Master, mentioned an article she once read asking speculative novelists how poetry influenced their writing. As writers gushed about their love of poetry, Bergmann was not impressed. “Every one of them cited the out-of-date warhorses they’d been assigned to read in high school or college intro to lit classes,” she said. Sure, there are a lot of excellent poems from long ago, but the proliferation of speculative poetry awards can help you find shiny new poems that are more precious than mithril. (Or to avoid the dead-white-guy reference: soul-guarding poems more potent than kenet, the dragon-fire-protective ointment imagined by Robin McKinley).
Miguel O. Mitchell, Dwarf Stars Editor (2023, 2025), similarly advocates for readers to explore a wide range of poetry: short and long poems, poems by writers known and unknown. Mitchell hopes readers will “discover gems from the less famous [writers].” In poetry lists, you may recognize names from past Nebula or Hugo ballots such as Amal El-Mohtar, Beth Cato, Theodora Goss, and Jane Yolen. You should definitely read their poetry, and as you admire words by familiar writers, take a peek at nearby poems too. Many journals publish online and are free to read. Open as browser tabs impulsively! Read for awards, and sometimes just for the love of words.
How do we celebrate excellent speculative poetry? “The work of SFPA has always been to model some of the many possible ways…but we’re by no means the only arbiters of taste,” says Bryan Thao Worra, SFPA President from 2016 to 2022 and first Lao American member of the Horror Writers Association (HWA). Awards typically focus on one poem, a book/chapbook, or a writer. SFPA has been presenting the Rhysling Award since 1978 and has been adding to its bouquet of awards.
SFPA’s Rhysling Award goes to an individual poem in two categories: short and long. Since adding the Grand Master Award in 1999, the group has named twelve worthy poets. The Dwarf Stars Award has been praising very short poems since 2006. Books and chapbooks have been earning the Elgin Award since 2013. Most recently, the Lifetime Service Award was established in 2023. SFPA has been cultivating excitement and awards for decades.
Others have picked up on the excitement. The HWA was an early adopter, adding Best Poetry Collection to their Bram Stoker selections in 2000. They have also published an annual Poetry Showcase since 2014, providing a celebration without an associated award.
From the World Science Fiction Society (WSFS) at Seattle Worldcon 2025, one Best Poem will win a Hugo Award. Seattle chose to add the special category, but the category will go away unless the bylaws are amended (fortunately, there is an initiative to add that amendment). Worldcon 2025 also named WSFS’s first Poet Laureate, Brandon O’Brien. I hope other conventions follow the lead!
Starting in 2026, SFWA will bestow a Nebula Award to one Best Poem each year. I look forward to seeing the suggested reading list and first year of finalists.
When I asked multi-award-winning New Zealand writer Lee Murray for her thoughts, she emphasized, “Different awards address different aspects of poetry.” The awards discussed here are still rather US-centric. Murray pointed out that regional awards, small communities, and connecting with non-spec writing communities all expand the influence of speculative poetry.
Will the voting groups agree? Hugo and Nebula voters pick the same novel a little under half the time. There’s less convergence as word count shrinks. Novellas, novelettes, and short stories are each less likely to win both awards.
Count of Shared Hugo and Nebula Wins by Decade and Category
With poetry’s abundant candidates, I suspect nominations and votes will root far and wide. Thao Worra agrees that one poem is unlikely to win everything, “and that’s good for the field,” he says.
If the Hugos do not adopt poetry long term, then the awards from SFPA and SFWA will be the top tastemakers for individual speculative poems written in English. It will be interesting to see how the distinct-yet-overlapping communities agree and disagree on “The Best.”
What else can I say other than “I hope you participate”?
Poetry is brevity, gravity, and line breaks. It is the good kind of dangerous. It can shatter your world and open new universes—parallel, perpendicular, and oblique.
Read.
Celebrate.
Vote!
Explore more articles from SPECULATIVE POETICS
Brian U. Garrison (he/him) writes poetry for children, adults, and grand adults. He has been a member of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Poetry Association (SFPA) since 2012 and was elected President in 2025. He joined SFWA in 2023. His work on the Rhysling Awards includes co-editing the anthology (2022, 2024), leading the effort to add a jury process, and shepherding volunteers. He is a program volunteer with Seattle Worldcon 2025 but is not part of the awards team. Brian’s chapbooks include New Yesterdays New Tomorrows (self-published) and Micropoetry for Microplanets (Space Cowboy Books). He lives under a tall, leafy tree in Portland, Oregon. More at www.bugthewriter.com.
The post Awards in Speculative Poetry: Ways (and Reasons) to Celebrate Excellent Writing appeared first on SFWA.