julesjones: (Default)
julesjones ([personal profile] julesjones) wrote2009-08-22 03:30 pm

methinks he has an axe to grind

Quote from the back cover blurb of Desmond Morris's "The Human Zoo":

"Under natural conditions, wild animals do not mutilate themselves, masturbate, attack their offspring, develop stomach ulcers, become fetishists, suffer from obesity, form homosexual pair-bonds."

"Yet confined in the unnatural conditions of captivity, they exhibit just such neurotic behaviour patterns common to urban man caged in his crowded cities.


Granted, this book was first published in 1969. But even then, it required a certain level of wilful ignorance to think that some of the behaviours cited do not occur in wild animals. This strikes me as being very carefully pitched to push certain buttons guaranteed to ensure brisk sales. The contents are probably much less idiotic, but my impression of Morris has long been that his science is heavily coloured by his personal views on such things as the moral value of various sexual acts, and that he is not aware of this. This is always a hazard for writers of popular anthropology and related subjects, of course, but I think my tolerance for it has dropped sharply over the years. This one's going on the "who wants it?" shelf.

[identity profile] spindriftdancer.livejournal.com 2009-08-23 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. Like my cat and wool blankets.
(hides the wool blankets forever)

[identity profile] birdsedge.livejournal.com 2009-08-23 07:24 pm (UTC)(link)
It sure is. I once had care of a stallion that used to be at stud and was no longer 'getting any'. He certainly knew how to 'relieve tension'.