(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-09 05:40 pm (UTC)
julesjones: (Default)
From: [personal profile] julesjones
When I started my spreadsheet it was just the copy numbers, since it was all from the publisher's website anyway. I'd need to go back and do some comparisons on the statements to get a feel for overall percentages, but my impression is that currently more money per copy heads my way from ARe than from FW.

The Barnes&Noble numbers are just starting to show up, and they really are a tiny trickle, but right now they're paying more per copy than FW is. I suspect that this is partly because FW is forever running promotions that mean the net passed back to the publisher to share with the author can be as low as 25% of cover, and B&N hasn't really got into that game yet.

However, as some of the people buying through FW are people who wouldn't buy ebooks other than through a distributor anyway, I'm not going to grumble too much. FW does offer some significant benefits to users other than than never-ending promotions, so I can see *why* some readers would rather buy there than direct.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

julesjones: (Default)
julesjones

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags