The Name of the Doctor
May. 19th, 2013 09:13 amWell, that was fun. :-) And nice to see the Paternoster Gang being shown with a bit more depth -- Strax in particular, as he's suffered a bit from being the comic relief.
"In the name of peace and sanity." So, are we about to be shown that Nine was actually Ten, or is that just what Moffatt wants us to think?
"In the name of peace and sanity." So, are we about to be shown that Nine was actually Ten, or is that just what Moffatt wants us to think?
(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-20 01:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-20 06:34 am (UTC)There's nothing to stop him from being a future incarnation, and that was my initial impression. But the Valeyard as previously presented doesn't quite fit, even if he was explicitly mentioned in the episode -- although retconning the trial arc could be an interesting story in itself.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-21 01:48 am (UTC)Thing is, if Clara is supposed to have seen the Doctor's entire life up until "her" Doctor, why didn't she see this guy? The Doctor not liking to think of that incarnation of himself as the Doctor shouldn't have stopped him from being part of his own timeline.
For that matter, why doesn't Clara know anything about Doctors past Matt!Doc? Did anyone who entered that timestream -- namely Clara, the Great Intelligence, and the Doctor himself -- have to fall out at the same point they fell in? What stopped them from going right to the end of the Doctor's life and all of his incarnations? Other than the fact that we can't have Clara survive knowing the Doctor's future, of course.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-19 09:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-19 09:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-19 09:58 am (UTC)I must have missed that, as I didn't pick up on anything about him other than that he had rejected being known as the Doctor.
I suppose it could be pre-Hartnell. I'd always assumed that his Doctor was the first in the line, but I suppose we don't know that for a fact.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-19 10:45 am (UTC)It's... interesting. There's a lot of different ways you could read that, which is doubtless exactly what the Moff intended.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-19 02:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-19 06:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-05-20 01:16 am (UTC)