A less good review...
Feb. 26th, 2007 11:02 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Mrs Giggles didn't like Lord and Master. On the other hand, she did give it a 68, and said that someone looking for a low-conflict romance might enjoy it, in a way that I don't think was pure snark.
This is the sort of thing I was talking about in my post last year on review writing. A good reviewer recognises that other people have different tastes, and says enough about why they liked or disliked a book for other readers to calibrate to their own taste. Yes, I'd much rather she loved the book, but this is still a helpful review, even if it stings.
This is the sort of thing I was talking about in my post last year on review writing. A good reviewer recognises that other people have different tastes, and says enough about why they liked or disliked a book for other readers to calibrate to their own taste. Yes, I'd much rather she loved the book, but this is still a helpful review, even if it stings.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 08:00 pm (UTC)I loved the story. I found it very entertaining. I loved the characters and the reverse stereotype.
shari
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-02-27 11:37 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 10:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-27 05:01 am (UTC)I do enjoy seeing Mrs. Giggles skewer some authors *cough cough*LaurellKHamilton*cough*. I haven't read Lord and Master so I can't say if I think she's smoking crack or what. I can understand that it stings - it sucks to hear her say that the characters you love and lived with for so long have no meaningful conflict - but it does feel like she tried really hard to point out the good things that she liked, and to admit that it might be just what some readers are looking for.
Here's hoping you don't take it too hard. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: