Not Worksafe

[julesjones]

I won't name the guilty party, as it was in a friends-locked post, but someone on my flist has just had a Share And Enjoy moment with this link, and I see no reason to refrain from infecting others:

http://www.teddy-babes.com/

Comments

Re: You can mention my name.

[julesjones]

This is true. Being a middle-aged female recluse makes me slightly less aware of this, particularly as I have been involved in activities where the MMFRs have to go out of their way to avoid having the teen porn thrust upon them, as it were.

"No, we don't want to read your Harry/Draco, and no, it's not because it's chan. It's because you haven't learnt that the spellchecker is your friend."

Re: You can mention my name.

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

the spellchecker is your friend.

My spellchecker wanted to do things that are illegal in six states and two provinces to the spelling of the names of the contributors of the next Datlow anthology.

Re: You can mention my name.

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

This is true. Being a middle-aged female recluse makes me slightly less aware of this,

Various nonfiction procedural shows lead me to believe that in the right light, I could be fit into profiles I have no desire to be fit into [1], so I am careful to stay aloof.

I did wonder a bit what would happen when I called in that body a while back but I wasn't going to leave him there and apparently he was still alive.

Re: You can mention my name.

[julesjones]

Yes. There is the problem of fitting the profile of "convenient scapegoat". And it does happen, as some of the more notorious miscarriage of justice cases demonstrate.