Not Worksafe

[julesjones]

I won't name the guilty party, as it was in a friends-locked post, but someone on my flist has just had a Share And Enjoy moment with this link, and I see no reason to refrain from infecting others:

http://www.teddy-babes.com/

Comments

[strix-an-stones.livejournal.com]

Neat... I see your pillow pal and raise you a real pal ;)

http://www.realdoll.com/intro.asp

Totally not work safe either, but impressive.

You can mention my name.

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

I friends-locked it in a vain attempt to avoid corrupting all those young LJers who have not yet friendsed me.

It seems inevitable that the Hoka fans will eventually think of the obvious fan-related ap.

Re: You can mention my name.

[julesjones]

Have you *seen* some of the stuff the young are putting on their LJs?

And I hate to say this, but I believe that certain Star Wars fans at least have long since thought of the obvious application, and possibly put it into practice. The version I heard about was at least done with a certain amount of gleeful cycnicism involved...

Re: You can mention my name.

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

Have you *seen* some of the stuff the young are putting on their LJs?

No, actually.

I think there may be a slight difference how people see teens sharing images with other teens and some middle-aged male recluse doing the same thing.

Re: You can mention my name.

[julesjones]

This is true. Being a middle-aged female recluse makes me slightly less aware of this, particularly as I have been involved in activities where the MMFRs have to go out of their way to avoid having the teen porn thrust upon them, as it were.

"No, we don't want to read your Harry/Draco, and no, it's not because it's chan. It's because you haven't learnt that the spellchecker is your friend."

Re: You can mention my name.

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

the spellchecker is your friend.

My spellchecker wanted to do things that are illegal in six states and two provinces to the spelling of the names of the contributors of the next Datlow anthology.

Re: You can mention my name.

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

This is true. Being a middle-aged female recluse makes me slightly less aware of this,

Various nonfiction procedural shows lead me to believe that in the right light, I could be fit into profiles I have no desire to be fit into [1], so I am careful to stay aloof.

I did wonder a bit what would happen when I called in that body a while back but I wasn't going to leave him there and apparently he was still alive.

Re: You can mention my name.

[julesjones]

Yes. There is the problem of fitting the profile of "convenient scapegoat". And it does happen, as some of the more notorious miscarriage of justice cases demonstrate.

[julesjones]

I find those things a bit creepy. They're *too* realistic in some ways. The teddy Babes don't cross that line, at least for me.

[yourbob.livejournal.com]

You're just Wierd. I knew there was a reason I liked you.

[julesjones]

They're... well-endowed, aren't they? And remarkably cheap too in comparison with the plushie version.

[yourbob.livejournal.com]

Men are always cheaper.

[strix-an-stones.livejournal.com]

Well... I suppose it depends on where they put the inflation nozzle. I kept looking at the Holmes one wondering which face was painted on, his or the actor who played him in Boogie Nights. Too few women today would actually recognize the real Johnny H.

[yourbob.livejournal.com]

I think Marky Mark would be rather quick to sue if they used him. Val Kilmer (Wonderland - actually about J.H.) might enjoy the noteriety.

[strix-an-stones.livejournal.com]

Oh now, there's a tasty thought...which man to choose? All three are stellar, though I'd prefer the latter two. Val Kilmer, yeah, I could see him getting a laugh out of it and seeing it as more of a compliment. He's never done a bad movie, wait, he's done movies that ended up being not so good but his acting is always superb. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is hilarious.

[mishalak.livejournal.com]

Dude... I can't imagine that working very well. I mean.. inflatable. And he won't look like the guy on the package, that's for sure. If I want a guy to pose any way I want I'll go find one at a leather bar. <laugh>

[julesjones]

Inflatable! Bouncy! Isn't bouncy what a lot of guys are looking for? [smiles sweetly]

(

[mishalak.livejournal.com]

I hope not. I'm nothing like a balloon. Way too boney.

[yourbob.livejournal.com]

Some are, some aren't. And it depends on which parts are bouncy and which parts are not.

[yourbob.livejournal.com]

Yeah, that's a place you can find lots of poses to choose from.

[mishalak.livejournal.com]

Yeah and if you hose them down with water the leather hardens up so they can't move. <laugh>

[yourbob.livejournal.com]

THAT is an interesting thought.

[julesjones]

Given how many smut writers are reading this thread, that *may* have been an unwise thought to put into people's minds.

[yourbob.livejournal.com]

Ideas are never unwise. Only carrying some of them out.

(evil grin)

[steverogerson.livejournal.com]

Crikey, $500 for a doll. I'll stick to wanking.

[ruthi.livejournal.com]

New wrongness.

[julesjones]

The original thread over on James' LJ has produced even more wrongness. Flying Spaghetti Monster porn...

This is worse

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

http://www.huggableurns.com/

Re: This is worse

[julesjones]

You're right. It's worse.

Re: This is worse

[james-nicoll.livejournal.com]

The future will be a cornucopia of regretable commercial products.

Re: This is worse

[yourbob.livejournal.com]

And it could be made even worse.

Shudder.

Huggable urns.

[watervole.livejournal.com]

Yuk. That's worse than the teddy dolls.