julesjones: (Default)
You might remember that back in January there was uproar in the romance blogosphere when major author Cassie Edwards was shown to have engaged in extensive plagiarism of other people's work, both non-fiction and fiction. The initial reaction of her publishers was to ignore this, but now one publisher has announced that they will no longer be publishing her books. Full details in the AP report, but the meat is this:

"Signet has conducted an extensive review of all its Cassie Edwards novels and due to irreconcilable editorial differences, Ms. Edwards and Signet have mutually agreed to part ways," the publisher said in a statement Friday.

"Cassie Edwards novels will no longer be published with Signet Books. All rights to Ms. Edwards' previously published Signet books have reverted to the author."

Jane of the blog Dear Author has written a letter to Signet thanking them for taking this situation seriously. It's worth taking a moment to tell Signet that their action has been appreciated.
julesjones: (Default)
Conversation with the genre -- plagiarism, allusion, and intertextuality


An extensive discussion about plagiarism has been going on in some of the romance blogs over the last few weeks. One thread in the discussion has been about the difference between allusion and plagiarism. Why is one acceptable and the other not, and what is the difference between them? After all, both involve the use of someone else's work, even to the extent of word-for-word copying.

For me, the difference between the two is very simple in theory, even if in practice it's not always possible for a reader to be certain what an author had in mind. If your intent as an author is that your audience should recognise the work you're quoting, or at the very least realise that it's intended as a reference to someone else's work, you're making an allusion. If you are hoping that they won't notice that it's not your own words, that's plagiarism. For this is the key part of what plagiarism is -- that you are taking the credit for work that was in fact done by someone else.
detailed discussion, with examples )
Perhaps the simplest test of all, if you're a writer wondering whether what you want to do is on the wrong side of the line: ask yourself how you would feel about someone doing to your work what you're proposing to do to someone else's. And be honest with your answer.


My thanks to the people who looked over the draft of this post and made helpful comments.
julesjones: (Default)
This has been rumbling on all week, but until now it's been chunks lifted from non-fiction sources. It's just possible to believe that an author could believe that this was acceptable behaviour (clue: it's not, and it's still plagiarism). But the latest news tonight is that the eerie similarities include ones to a 1930 Pulitzer Prize winning *novel*.

The academic romance blog Teach Me Tonight has two posts (so far) on the nature of plagiarism:
http://teachmetonight.blogspot.com/2008/01/publish-and-be-damned-incorrect-use-of.html
http://teachmetonight.blogspot.com/2008/01/words-words-words-1.html

I'd comment there, but I've just used up my typing ability for the day. I'm off to bed with a hot water bottle. :-(

Profile

julesjones: (Default)
julesjones

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags