julesjones: (Default)
This has been rumbling on all week, but until now it's been chunks lifted from non-fiction sources. It's just possible to believe that an author could believe that this was acceptable behaviour (clue: it's not, and it's still plagiarism). But the latest news tonight is that the eerie similarities include ones to a 1930 Pulitzer Prize winning *novel*.

The academic romance blog Teach Me Tonight has two posts (so far) on the nature of plagiarism:
http://teachmetonight.blogspot.com/2008/01/publish-and-be-damned-incorrect-use-of.html
http://teachmetonight.blogspot.com/2008/01/words-words-words-1.html

I'd comment there, but I've just used up my typing ability for the day. I'm off to bed with a hot water bottle. :-(
julesjones: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] sarahf has done an analysis of the power dynamics in The Syndicate and tied it into some of the things going on in romance novels in general. Obviously I have a rather large bias here, but I think it's an interesting analysis with some useful things to say, and worth the attention of a few people on my flist:
http://teachmetonight.blogspot.com/2007/12/syndicate-and-power-dynamics.html

Profile

julesjones: (Default)
julesjones

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags