julesjones: (Default)
Woke up this morning to the news that Samhain Publishing is closing its doors. Neatly and tidily, and will be open for some time to come - but anything not ready to go will be released back to the author, and as contracts expire they will not be renewed. If you would like to buy any of their books, it would be a good idea to make it sooner rather than later. But not today, because I've seen something on Twitter this morning about a 40% off sale on Monday for purchases direct from their website.

I never submitted to them, in large part because I was reluctant to submit to a start-up with a 7 year contract term until they'd demonstrated they could stick around long enough to justify that contract length, and by the time they'd done that I wasn't writing because my health had dropped off a cliff. They've had a couple of wobbles over the years (the metadata copyright thing comes to mind), but in general have treated their authors and staff well, and I had some material in the pipeline I wanted to submit to them. I'm not surprised they're doing the classy thing, and planning to wind down the company in a way that maximises everyone's income, and the chances of the authors getting their rights back intact.

I've already seen some comments from the "self-pub rules, trad-pub sucks" corner of the internet about how evil Samhain is for not just letting the authors go immediately and going into bankruptcy, so that the authors can self-pub. That's not the way US bankruptcy law works, kids. The bankruptcy court can go after any assets deemed to have been transferred prior to the bankruptcy to avoid being seized as part of the assets, and that includes the book contracts - they are, after all, the primary asset of a publisher. It doesn't matter if you have a parachute clause stating all the rights revert back to you on bankruptcy - those aren't worth the electrons they're written on. The court can and does quash asset transfers going back months before the actual bankruptcy.

Oh, and as KJ Charles noted in Twitter this morning, any publisher gloating over Samhain's demise is a publisher you do not want to touch with a bargepole. They're demonstrating how they'll treat *you*.

julesjones: (Default)
I've been mostly offline for the last couple of weeks, so I'm late with this news. Romance book blogger Jane Litte and her group blog Dear Author have been sued by erotic romance publisher Ellora's Cave for reporting on the problems experienced by some of EC's authors. Those problems include allegations by a number of authors of late or non-existent royalties payments, and books being put out with little or no editing.

There is now a defence fund, as this is going to be an expensive suit to fight. I've donated, because I believe that Dear Author should be able to report legitimate concerns about a publisher's behaviour without fear. There's more information about the fund at Dear Author's post. As some people in comments have been concerned about their legal name being exposed by the donation process, I can report that the GoFundMe site asks for your name twice, the first time being the name to use on the public acknowledgement, and the second time defaulting to using the same name but allowing it to be changed to the name on your credit card. There's also an option to be anonymous on the public acknowledgement.

It's been mentioned in the comment threads at Dear Author (and in the coverage at the Absolute Write Water Cooler, which is where I first saw the news) that a few authors have been publicly gloating about the lawsuit. The authors in question have had poor reviews, and as a result think that the Dear Author blog deserves everything it gets by way of punishment. They're being very short-sighted. It may give them a warm happy glow now to see their supposed nemesis punished, but the chilling effect of this suit is going to have major repercussions for authors if bloggers decide it's safer not to report on publishers' misdeeds. That includes the self-publishing platforms -- some of those have done some very naughty things that I'd rather know about when I'm deciding where to publish.

No, I'm not just saying this because Dear Author was nice to me. The only review I've ever had from Dear Author was a D, and I think it did hurt my sales. I'm saying this because I think that Dear Author's reporting is good for authors in general, and I resent someone trying to make them shut up.
julesjones: (Default)
On a more cheerful note...

Charlie has posted several more installments of Common Misperceptions About Publishing since I last linked. These are primarily aimed at demystifying the publishing industry for readers, but are also extremely useful for new(ish) writers and for small press writers interested in how mid-list works.

CMAP 4: Territories, Translations and Foreign Rights. Amongst other things, this goes into excruciating detail about why you can't buy that ebook edition you want just because you're in the wrong country. It also looks at how the various markets differ in formats and distribution of books, and how foreign rights can add up to a serious chunk of change that can make the difference between needing a day job and earning a reasonable living as a writer.

CMAP #5: Why books are the length they are. There is a reason why print books are the various lengths they are, and why that can change from market to market. As I chip in with somewhere down the comment thread, one major reason why I am epublished is the length I tend to write at -- never mind the hot boy-on-boy action, it's my word count that doesn't suit the current print market.

CMAP #6: Why did you pick such an awful cover for your new book? There is backstory here. As he eventually says, Charlie had an Unfortunate Experience with the US cover of Saturn's Children. Quite a lot of people assumed that he had something to do with said cover, but in fact authors have little to no say over what goes onto the book jacket. As a small press author at a fairly flexible epublisher, I have a lot more say over the cover matter on my books than Charlie does on his mid-list books, and I still don't have an actual veto over what my publisher chooses in its wisdom to put on my books. As Charlie discusses, there is a good reason for this, even if it ever so occasionally results in Author Weeping Into Beer.

Lots of good stuff there, in both the main posts and the comment threads.
julesjones: (Default)
I linked to a short draft of this yesterday, but Charlie has now posted the expanded version of Amazon, Macmillan: an outsider's guide to the fight. This is really worth your time to read, if you want to understand what's been going on in the lead-up to this weekend's uproar, and why Amazon is *not* working in the long-term best interest of readers.

Charlie also has a link round-up of other useful posts on the Amazon Macmillan stare-down.

Profile

julesjones: (Default)
julesjones

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags