julesjones: (Default)
I linked to a short draft of this yesterday, but Charlie has now posted the expanded version of Amazon, Macmillan: an outsider's guide to the fight. This is really worth your time to read, if you want to understand what's been going on in the lead-up to this weekend's uproar, and why Amazon is *not* working in the long-term best interest of readers.

Charlie also has a link round-up of other useful posts on the Amazon Macmillan stare-down.
julesjones: (Default)
Just in case you haven't seen it -- Amazonfail #3 is in progress.

http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/012148.html
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-note-on-ebook-pricing/
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/01/30/its-all-about-timing/

My view on this is fairly similar to Charlie's. However, I simply stopped adding links rather than pulling all my links last time round, and was willing to forgive when they fixed the last one. The reason for that is that Amazon, for all its faults, was even throughout the LGBTfail willing to sell anyone pretty much anything, so long as they could actually track it down in the catalogue.

It's different now. They've deleted an entire publisher from their catalogue. Not made it hard to find them, but pulled the entries altogether. And that takes away my reason to put up with assorted nonsense over the years, which was that Amazon was a lifeline for a lot of minorities, because it really would send you anything legal to buy, in a nice friendly brown box.

I won't have time to sort out my website and blogs until I get home in a couple of weeks, but my Amazon links are going bye-bye.
julesjones: (Default)
I've only just seen this and haven't had time to do any checking. Picked up from a comment in the "Amazon's Very Bad Day" Thread on Making Light:
http://www.afterellen.com/node/48877

Does not look good for Amazon's "Whoops!" explanation.
julesjones: (Default)
The sales rank for The Syndicate is back on Amazon UK this evening:

Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 118,293 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Popular in this category:
#41 in Books > Fiction > Gay & Lesbian > Erotica > Gay

And on Amazon US as well, though with the pathetic sales rank you'd expect of a small press book that's been out of print for nearly a year now.
julesjones: (Default)
Jane at Dear Author has done some digging into the metadata on the censored/not censored books, and yes, it does look like it's the category data that's being used to filter, and that *anything* with "gay" or "lesbian" in the category metadata is being hit, which is why we're seeing things like the hardback edition of Barrowman's autobiography filtered and the paperback edition left alone.

Next question -- who in Amazon decided that "gay" and "lesbian" are automatically adult content? If this came from the top, that's a problem. If it was somewhere a lot lower down, that's *still* a problem. Whatever it is, it's not a glitch.

amazonfail

Apr. 13th, 2009 09:21 am
julesjones: (Default)
It's the morning after the night before...

Just in case you've been under a rock, Amazon has been removing the sales rankings on a lot of books, with a very heavy skew towards books that have LGBT terms in the keywords regardless of their sexual content, and a skew towards alternative sexuality books of all kinds, and to erotica aimed at women. And a few other things besides, while leaving other things untouched, which together give a rather disturbing picture of pandering to a particular narrow viewpoint of what "adult" consists of. This completely removes those books from view on many of the search functions, and on things like "if you liked this book..."

I think it's not actually that likely that the exact pattern of censorship is an official corporate policy. I think it's much more likely to be one or more of the following possibilities that have been floated during the discussion: some pressure group gaming the automated "report this item as offensive" system; a kneejerk corporate reaction to complaints about "porn" without thinking things through; some mid-level manager showing his/her bigotry in public by imposing personal standards of "adult" on a new filtering system without the knowledge of the higher-ups, etc, etc.

But if that's the case, then Amazon need to think long and hard about how they got gamed, whether externally or internally. And for those who think there's nothing to worry about, because it was only the queers and the feminists and the pornographers who got hit -- what happens when *your* interests get the same treatment?

Because that's the real issue underlying this -- Amazon has just censored a whole lot of books by making it almost impossible to find them in their database. They're a private organisation and they have the right to do that if they want, but it's not something I want to encourage. What will be the next target of this censorship? I believe an opt-in filter with a sane definition of adult would be a good and useful service for them to offer, but this is neither opt-in nor sane.
julesjones: (Default)
I usually post on Easter Sunday about the Two Great Commandments, and usually in reference to a very specific application of the second of those. This year I was going to do a somewhat different theme, on my choice of Easter eggs, and Fair Trade, and walking away from Omelas. Unfortunately I've got reason this afternoon to go back to the usual.

I will begin by quoting from Teresa Nielsen Hayden's magnificent "Things I believe" post for Easter Day 2004, a beautiful meditation on the Nicene Creed:

I believe in the God of the Burgess Shale, Who not only made creation stranger than we know, but stranger than we could ever imagine.

These are the words of someone who believes, who believes very deeply. And who also believes this:

I believe that any Christians whose religious practices aren’t centered around sacrificing and burning animals ought not spend all their time trying to enforce obscure passages in the Pentateuch.

I believe that as well. As do a number of other people who write, edit or publish books which have just been censored by Amazon for their adult content, where "adult" is deemed to include anything that portrays homosexuality in a positive or even neutral light. This is the thing which many people overlook when they associate Christianity with an obsession with controlling sexuality, who believe that a Christian, by definition, disapproves of homosexuality -- there are a good many Christians who don't. Who believe that the persecution of people for no better reason than their loving, consensual relationships with other adults is a direct repudiation of the second of the Two Great Commandments, and thus of the message which Jesus gave to us. Which he died, horribly and in pain and in public shame, to give to us. This is the passage in question:

Jesus said to him, "'You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like it: 'You shall love your neighbour as yourself.' On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets." Matthew 22:37-40

And when he was asked, "Lord, who is my neighbour?", he made it very clear through a parable that your neighbours are not just the people you like and approve of. Not just the people who are just like you.

I am not as good as I might be, as I should be, at keeping those commandments. But as a Christian, I must at least try to keep the spirit of the second. As indeed must adherents of other religions with similar messages, and those who follow no religion or faith at all. This is what it means to be truly human -- that whatever we believe to be the source of the impulse to love our neighbours, whether we have one god or many or none, we believe that others are human too.

julesjones: (Default)
Oh joy. There's been some suspicion over the last few days that Amazon has been hiding LGBT books (and possibly small press het erotica) from general view by removing the sales rankings so they don't show up unless you actively search for them by title or author. There'd been a lot of bland evasion when the authors asked them about it. Now a publisher has asked via a publisher-orientated back-channel, and been told that yes, it *is* very deliberate censorship of the "adult" titles to keep them out of general view. And in the case of LGBT titles, it's not just the smut that's been hidden. The YA titles are being suppressed from view as well.

More details via [livejournal.com profile] storm_grant's post here: http://storm-grant.livejournal.com/160240.html

I don't normally make a point of this, but in this case I think it's necessary: I'm Kinsey 0, i.e. very, *very* straight. I am, at least on the surface, one of the people Amazon thinks needs to be protected from exposure to That Sort Of Thing. Thanks, but I don't really need to be protected from the knowledge that YA gay literature exists, at least not while you're still happy to show me the raunchiest of mainstream bonkbusters and airport novels.

Profile

julesjones: (Default)
julesjones

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags