julesjones: (Default)
Went to two plays in March which I didn't get around to writing up at the time.

"Orlando" was an adaptation of Virginia Woolf's gender-bending novel, at the Royal Exchange in Manchester. Excellent cast, and some stunning wirework that took full advantage of the Royal's in-the-round format.

"The Mousetrap" was the diamond anniversary touring production of Agatha Christie's venerable play, which was at the Lowry in Salford for a week. Enormous fun, played by an excellent cast. Yes, it's very much a period piece, but that's part of its charm. And knowing the solution, I'd be happy to go and see it again, because a lot of its appeal comes from watching the characters do their thing, not just trying to work out whodunnit and why before the characters do.
julesjones: (Default)
Went to see the final night of the Royal Exchange Manchester's production of "Much Ado About Nothing" at the weekend.

This production puts the play into a (more or less) modern setting, but does so to good purpose. The weary soldiers returning home after a successful battle are in the uniforms of the second world war, and the women waiting to greet them are are likewise dressed for the 1940s. There's a very clear parallel drawn between Shakespeare's original setting, and this more recent demobbing. It also supports the gender-bending of some of the roles. Leonato is now Leonata, the Governor who has stayed at home during the war to manage the home front. Likewise the constables, who are women, and air raid wardens. The story works very well in the post-WWII setting.

The bit that was traditional was the stage setting, in the round and with very little scenery. This is a function of the theatre's design, a theatre in the round set on the main floor of the old Exchange building. The theatre company does some remarkable adaptations to suit playscripts to its unusual space, but this time out they were presenting a play originally written for that context.

And they presented it very well. The audience was rocking with laughter at the funny bits, and rapt at the dramatic bits. And occasionally becoming part of the scenery... It's always slightly dangerous sitting on the edge of the seating area at the Exchange, but this time most of the two front rows got to find out why. They were used first by Benedick and then by Beatrice as cover to eavesdrop on conversations. Since I was sitting on the aisle by one of the doorways I was slightly nervous, but fortunately someone else got handed a constable's tea mug.

All in all, a wonderful evening. With an excellent cast and direction, this was well worth seeing.
julesjones: (Default)
Went along to the Royal Exchange Theatre last night to see their production of Sondheim's Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street. I'm familiar with the legend and with the plot of Sondheim's musical version, and I've heard a lot of the music, but this was the first time I'd actually seen it performed.

General impression: absolutely stunning. There were one or two minor glitches in the sound, but the cast was superb, as was the small group of musicians up in the first level. There's a lot of very dark humour along with the horror, but it requires good timing to make it work. The timing here was perfect, making the audience laugh even as they were flinching at the horror that underlay the story. Both the singing and acting were excellent, and David Birrell as Sweeney Todd pulled off the difficult trick of making a serial killer sympathetic.

The Exchange is a theatre in the round, in an amazing glass and steel capsule on the floor of the old exchange building. That imposes certain restrictions on how pieces can be staged -- most importantly for this production, there is in essence only one stage level, with no below-stage space or real ability to build up a second level more than a couple of feet above the main stage level. Given that a major element in the plot is Sweeney Todd's barber chair tipping right back to send a victim down a chute to the bakehouse on the floor below, some careful staging was going to be needed. The production team had done a wonderful job of symbolising the chute by running the chair back and forth along a track on the stage, which at the climax of one song results in an actual production line of chairs going back and forth as Sweeney settles into the routine of killing.

Coupled with this, in some scenes there are two different areas on the stage representing the barber shop upstairs and the bakery downstairs, with action going on in each, and characters running up and down the stairs between the two rooms by going out of one of the stage exits and back in through another. The sets are fairly minimal, if well-executed, consisting largely of items of furniture that are moved in and out on the track, or by the chorus in full view of the audience.

It's a technique that requires willing suspension of disbelief from the audience, but when it works, as it does here, it results in an intense experience. This is enhanced because the physical space in the theatre capsule is quite small, putting everyone on the ground floor within a few feet of the stage. Possibly a little too close for one section of the front row, as they got a very close up view of the spurts of blood in one murder. :-)

The time period for this production has been brought forward from Victorian London to the Thatcherite era. It results in some anachronisms (it's a long time since prisoners were transported to Australia), but it's a good match for some of the social commentary in the play. It closes with a reprise of the main theme, with new verses warning the audience that any one of us could follow the same path as Sweeney, if pushed too far by injustice.

This is a superbly done production that puts together an excellent cast with an imaginative use of an unusual theatre space. I'm very fond of the Exchange, because it does this trick so well, but this was a particularly good example. It's on until 30 November -- go and see it if you're in the area.
julesjones: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] kalypso_v and I went to the Royal Exchange on Friday night to see Beautiful Thing. It turned out to be useful to have not got around to it until the final week of the run, because the performance was followed by a 40 minute set of half a dozen short monologues and duologues examining how things have changed for young LGBT people since the play was first performed in 1993.

The play was excellent, and very well adapted to the small theatre-in-the-round space of the Royal Exchange. The theatre's design means that anyone in the stage level seating is no further than six meters from the edge of the stage, and can readily see the audience on the other side of the stage, which has the odd effect of making you more aware that it's a play while at the same time drawing you in to the action. This makes for an intensely emotional experience when it works, as it did on Friday. A script that runs from hilariously funny to frightening to tender and back again within a few lines, and an uplifting ending that leaves you feeling hopeful without being saccharine; played by a cast that was utterly convincing as the play's characters.

The half dozen new pieces were of variable quality, although all were worth watching. The two standouts for me were Bread Bin and Snood, both of which I'd love to see again. (And I wish [livejournal.com profile] charlieallery could have seen Bread Bin, she'd love it.)

Profile

julesjones: (Default)
julesjones

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags